Mind you, closable predicates do open the door to circumscription. Which might reinforce your point. Simon (is it legal to shoot penguins in New Haven if you're not a pacifist?) On Jul 22, 2014 6:48 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > I find overriding to be a very scary feature. It is hard to define in > this context and hard to understand. I strongly suggest that it not be a > part of whatever comes out of a spec for RDF constraints. > > Overriding does not appear to be a part of the ShEx member submission. > > peter > > > > On 07/22/2014 03:35 AM, Olivier Rossel wrote: > >> Hi all. >> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature >> coming >> from RelaxNG: >> "extending and overriding shapes" >> >> cf the discussion here >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format# >> Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions >> >> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data >> descriptions >> on the long term (in standards, for example). >> >> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature. >> True? >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 19:15:46 UTC