W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx.

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:15:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CADE8KM5hjYMBs_CD=Da6TCQ0+4MjDp96LXSRqYEbH-mvO83RUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
Mind you, closable predicates do open the door to circumscription. Which
might reinforce your point.

Simon
(is it legal to shoot penguins in New Haven if you're not a pacifist?)
On Jul 22, 2014 6:48 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I find overriding to be a very scary feature.  It is hard to define in
> this context and hard to understand.  I strongly suggest that it not be a
> part of whatever comes out of a spec for RDF constraints.
>
> Overriding does not appear to be a part of the ShEx member submission.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 07/22/2014 03:35 AM, Olivier Rossel wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature
>> coming
>> from RelaxNG:
>> "extending and overriding shapes"
>>
>> cf the discussion here
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#
>> Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions
>>
>> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data
>> descriptions
>> on the long term (in standards, for example).
>>
>> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature.
>> True?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 19:15:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC