Mind you, closable predicates do open the door to circumscription. Which
might reinforce your point.
Simon
(is it legal to shoot penguins in New Haven if you're not a pacifist?)
On Jul 22, 2014 6:48 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I find overriding to be a very scary feature. It is hard to define in
> this context and hard to understand. I strongly suggest that it not be a
> part of whatever comes out of a spec for RDF constraints.
>
> Overriding does not appear to be a part of the ShEx member submission.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 07/22/2014 03:35 AM, Olivier Rossel wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature
>> coming
>> from RelaxNG:
>> "extending and overriding shapes"
>>
>> cf the discussion here
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#
>> Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions
>>
>> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data
>> descriptions
>> on the long term (in standards, for example).
>>
>> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature.
>> True?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>