Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx.

Mind you, closable predicates do open the door to circumscription. Which
might reinforce your point.

Simon
(is it legal to shoot penguins in New Haven if you're not a pacifist?)
On Jul 22, 2014 6:48 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I find overriding to be a very scary feature.  It is hard to define in
> this context and hard to understand.  I strongly suggest that it not be a
> part of whatever comes out of a spec for RDF constraints.
>
> Overriding does not appear to be a part of the ShEx member submission.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 07/22/2014 03:35 AM, Olivier Rossel wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature
>> coming
>> from RelaxNG:
>> "extending and overriding shapes"
>>
>> cf the discussion here
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#
>> Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions
>>
>> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data
>> descriptions
>> on the long term (in standards, for example).
>>
>> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature.
>> True?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>