Tuesday, 30 September 2008
- RE: personal review of SKOS Reference for WG consideration
- Re: Agenda TC 01/10/2008
- Agenda TC 01/10/2008
- Re: personal review of SKOS Reference for WG consideration
- RE: personal review of SKOS Reference for WG consideration
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138)
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138)
- RE: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138)
- Re: required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138)
- required timezone xsd dateTime datatype (ISSUE-138)
- personal review of SKOS Reference for WG consideration
- W3C SKOS Reference Last Call (3 days left in comment period)
- RE: OWL review drafts - new set today
- RE: OWL review drafts - new set today
- Re: OWL review drafts - new set today
- RE: OWL review drafts - new set today
- Re: OWL review drafts - new set today
- OWL review drafts - new set today
Sunday, 28 September 2008
- The second half of my response to review comments on Profiles: Ian's comments + Jim's comments
- The first half of my response to review comments on Profiles: some comments + Jeff's comments
Thursday, 25 September 2008
- Invitation to attend OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED) 2008
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
- XML Schema responses to our comments
- RE: We should turn facets into URIs in the spec
- RE: We should turn facets into URIs in the spec
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- RE: Restrictions on property chains
- Re: minutes of 17 September teleconference
- Requirements status
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Regrets
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Re: wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Quick reference guide status update
- Restrictions on property chains
- wording on Unknown returns in Conformance
- Proposed Resolution of Issue 134 - OWL 2 Metamodel
- Profile review
- Ian's review of the Profiles document
- Re: preview drafts
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
- Updated agenda for TC 2008-09-24
- RE: preview drafts
- Re: Agenda TC 24/09/2008
- Re: Agenda TC 24/09/2008
- Agenda TC 24/09/2008
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- RE: preview drafts
- Re: Review of Profiles Document
- Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- Review of Profiles Document
Monday, 22 September 2008
- Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- Re: preview drafts
- RE: preview drafts
- Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- preview drafts
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- We should turn facets into URIs in the spec
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: ACTION-210: Review on "Conformance" section
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Action 211: Review of Conformance Document
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: ACTION-210: Review on "Conformance" section
- Re: ACTION-210: Review on "Conformance" section
- ACTION 209: Review conformance
- ACTION 208: Add an editor's note to test and conformance document re: disposition of test cases
Sunday, 21 September 2008
Friday, 19 September 2008
- Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)
- Reflexive properties shjould be removed from OWL RL and OWL RL/RDF
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Re: Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- Survey on titles for OWL2 Semantics documents
- RE: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15
- Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15
- Editorial change in the spec: "Facet" vs. "Constraining Facet"
- minutes of 17 September teleconference
Thursday, 18 September 2008
Wednesday, 17 September 2008
- ACTION-213 completed
- Comment on mapping.
- Comment on syntax
- Re: Top property in property chains for the EL fragment.
- RE: Top property in property chains for the EL fragment.
- Re: Top property in property chains for the EL fragment.
- RE: Top property in property chains for the EL fragment.
- Top property in property chains for the EL fragment.
- RE: ACTION-172: Develop list of possible conflicts between XML Schema datatypes and OWL datatypes
- ACTION-172: Develop list of possible conflicts between XML Schema datatypes and OWL datatypes
- RE: My answers to Jie Bao's review of the Full Semantics
- Re: File extensions for different serializations of OWL
- Re: File extensions for different serializations of OWL
- File extensions for different serializations of OWL
- Re: My answers to Jie Bao's review of the Full Semantics
- DL-Semantics: wrong name in references
Tuesday, 16 September 2008
- Agenda TC 17/09/2008
- RDF-Based Semantics: Changes after the Review
- RE: Small discrepancy between the OWL RL set and the RDF semantics document
- Re: Small discrepancy between the OWL RL set and the RDF semantics document
- Small discrepancy between the OWL RL set and the RDF semantics document
- RE: better titles for the two Semantics documents?
- RE: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- Re: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- Re: better titles for the two Semantics documents?
- better titles for the two Semantics documents?
Monday, 15 September 2008
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Part II of my answers to PFPS' review of the RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 3--8
- RE: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: Comment on OWL 2 Full Semantics
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Comment on OWL 2 Full Semantics
- Re: Part II of my answers to PFPS' review of the RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 1 and 2
- Issue-144: missing base triple in serialization of axioms with annotations
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
Sunday, 14 September 2008
- Issue-140: Proposal to postpone
- RE: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- RE: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- RE: English examples in the OWL 2 syntax specification
- Part II of my answers to PFPS' review of the RDF-Based Semantics [RE: Initial comments on OWL 2 Full Semantics]
- SHOULD, MUST etc. in the other documents
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Bringing the Syntax document in line with RDF 2119 (MUST, MAY, etc.)
Saturday, 13 September 2008
- RE: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 3--8
- Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15
- Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 3--8
- Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 3--8
- Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 1 and 2
Friday, 12 September 2008
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
- RE: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: My answers to Jie Bao's review of the Full Semantics
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: Question about datatype maps
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- RE: Question about datatype maps
- Re: Question about datatype maps
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: Question about datatype maps
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: Question about datatype maps
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: Minutes from 10 Sep online
- Re: Minutes from 10 Sep online
- Minutes from 10 Sep online
- Re: My answers to Jie Bao's review of the Full Semantics
- FW: Question about datatype maps
- RE: Question about datatype maps
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- Question about datatype maps
- My answers to Jie Bao's review of the Full Semantics
Thursday, 11 September 2008
- Re: wiki down !
- wiki down !
- Candidate public working drafts
- Issue-130 (conformance)
- Resolution of ISSUE-133 (UNA in DL-Lite) implemented
- Part I of my answers to PFPS' review of the RDF-Based Semantics [RE: Initial comments on OWL 2 Full Semantics]
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
- ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)
- SKOS reference document analysis
- RDF Mapping document
- Re: Review of RDF mapping
- Re: XML Serialization document
- OWL Semantics document
- XML Serialization document
- RE: [ACTION-179] Review RDF-Based Semantics.
- Re: [ACTION-179] Review RDF-Based Semantics.
- [ACTION-179] Review RDF-Based Semantics.
Tuesday, 9 September 2008
- RE: ACTION-181: Review RDF-Based Semantics.
- ACTION-181: Review RDF-Based Semantics.
- RE: Review: XML Serialization
- changes to XML Serialization in response to review comments
- Re: Syntactic extensibility
- RE: Review: XML Serialization
- Re: Syntactic extensibility
- Review of the Syntax document
- RE: Review: XML Serialization
- Comment on OWL 2 Full Semantics
- Re: Review of RDF mapping
- Re: Review of RDF mapping
- Re: Review: Syntax
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: ACTION-206 [Modify the OWL 2 specification to refer to rdf:text] completed
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Review DL-Semantics
- RE: Review: Syntax
- RE: ACTION-206 [Modify the OWL 2 specification to refer to rdf:text] completed
- RE: ACTION-206 [Modify the OWL 2 specification to refer to rdf:text] completed
- RE: ACTION-206 [Modify the OWL 2 specification to refer to rdf:text] completed
- Review: Syntax
- Re: Review: RDF Mapping
Monday, 8 September 2008
- RE: Review: XML Serialization
- Review: RDF Mapping
- Review: XML Serialization
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- RE: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Review OWL 2 MT Semantics Document
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Review of RDF mapping
- Review, XML Serialization
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-71 [create datarange of literals matching given language range]
- Syntactic extensibility
- Proposal to close ISSUE-71 [create datarange of literals matching given language range]
- ACTION-206 [Modify the OWL 2 specification to refer to rdf:text] completed
- RE: ACTION-186: Review on DL-Semantics
- Re: Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- RE: Review DL-Semantics
- RE: ACTION-186: Review on DL-Semantics
- RE: Review OWL 2 MT Semantics Document
- [ACTION-187] Add turtle syntax to the Primer
- Re: Primer RDF/XML syntax
Sunday, 7 September 2008
- Re: Primer RDF/XML syntax
- Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
- Re: ACTION-186: Review on DL-Semantics
- Re: Review DL-Semantics
- Primer RDF/XML syntax
- RE: Review DL-Semantics
- Review DL-Semantics
- Re: Review OWL 2 MT Semantics Document
- RE: Issue-119 OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions
- ACTION-186: Review on DL-Semantics
Saturday, 6 September 2008
- RE: Review OWL 2 MT Semantics Document
- Issue-119 OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions
- Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
Friday, 5 September 2008
Thursday, 4 September 2008
- Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Last Call: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference; SKOS Primer updated
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
Wednesday, 3 September 2008
- Re: Issue-130 (conformance)
- Issue-130 (conformance)
- Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
- Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
- revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
- Review OWL 2 MT Semantics Document
- Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString
- RE: OWL 2 RL unification proposal: My comments
- Proposed resolution to ISSUE-133 (addressing ACTION-192)
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- OWL 2 RL unification proposal: My comments
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- Re: ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance
- RE: Initial comments on OWL 2 Full Semantics
- Re: Agenda TC 03/09/2008
- Initial comments on OWL 2 Full Semantics