Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
• To: sandro@w3.org
• Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20080903.160739.172948198.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes 
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400

> 
> > The revised draft letter is now available at
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime
> > 
> > After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML Schema WG.
> 
> Good.   Two points:
> 
>   1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4.  It seems to be based on thinking that
>      the 840 is hours instead of minutes.

The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours.  I could either make that explicit or
drop the (admittedly minor) point.

>   2. "Otherwise the WG will not requiring minimal conformance that is"
>                             ^be ?

And why didn't *you* make this editorial correction?  :-)

>       -- Sandro

peter

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 20:08:48 UTC