- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0100 > On 3 Sep 2008, at 21:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > > > From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> > > Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes > > Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400 > > > >> > >>> The revised draft letter is now available at > >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime > >>> > >>> After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML Schema WG. > >> > >> Good. Two points: > >> > >> 1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4. It seems to be based on thinking that > >> the 840 is hours instead of minutes. > > > > The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours. I could either make that explicit or > > drop the (admittedly minor) point. > > I tweaked this (by appending "i.e., -720 to +840" to the offending sentence). Feel free to change/delete this part -- it is, as you say, of minor importance. > > IMHO, it is now ready to go -- please send it to the XML Schema WG. > > Thanks for your efforts on this. > > Ian Sent to the XML Schema WG, as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2008JulSep/0135.html peter
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 12:57:31 UTC