RE: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15

Done! Here are the diffs:



RDF Mapping:


XML Syntax:



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Smith []
> Sent: 19 September 2008 14:25
> To: Boris Motik
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Response to the review comments of the Syntax document, Sections 9--15
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Boris Motik
> <> wrote:
> > @Mike, Section 9.4: I don't recall a particular motivation for the properties arguments preceding
> the class expression. If there is
> > no specific motivation, I suggest modifying this so that the class expression is first. This would
> match the RDF syntax and make
> > things a little easier for users. (A change from KeyFor to HasKey or something similar would
> probably go along with a reorder).
> >
> > I've followed Bijan's design here, which, I believe, has followed the usual DL syntax. The common
> reading is "Such-and-such
> > properties are the key for such-and-such class". I personally don't really care about the actual
> syntax. I haven't, however, changed
> > the spec yet: can you please coordinate with Bijan and perhaps the other interested parties?
> Bijan and Uli do not object to the change, and Evren, who raised the
> issue with me during his RDF document review, supports it.  So, not
> hearing objections from others I think we should change from KeyFor to
> HasKey and change the argument order so that all serializations (FS,
> RDF, XML) align.
> Thanks,
> --
> Mike Smith
> Clark & Parsia

Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 13:41:47 UTC