- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:42:03 -0400
- To: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
In addition, it appears that one can not annotate an import directive - this may be desirable, for example to comment on why a particular version uri was chosen. -Alan On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > "each annotation consists of an annotation property and an annotation value, > and the latter can be a literal, an entity, or an anonymous individual." > > then > > An owl:incompatibleWith annotation value is the location of a prior version > of the containing ontology that is incompatible with this ontology. > > Which sort of thing among literal, entity, or anonymous individual is "the > location" > > More generally, why is not any URI reference allowed as the value of an > annotation? > > The definition of entity should perhaps be earlier in the document, as it is > used several times before it is defined. > > The current definition would seem to preclude have an ontologyuri or > versionuri, for example, as values of an anntoation. > > -Alan > > >
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2008 21:42:38 UTC