- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:41:00 +0200
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 13:41:31 UTC
Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 15 Sep 2008, at 11:42, Jim Hendler wrote: > [snip] > > > Let me try to tease out the various options. Corrections welcome. > > 1) (Alan's) We put a *triple* (i.e., change the graph) in. Advantages: > "works"[1] for all RDF serializations. Disadvantages: Breaks syntactic > layering; contaminates the graph and the structural model; *requires* a > bespoke solution (thus precludes using standards like XInclude). > Just for my understanding: why would this solution preclude using XInclude? If there is an extra triple defined in some vocabulary, wouldn't that be orthogonal to the usage of XInclude? Cheers Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 13:41:31 UTC