W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:41:00 +0200
Message-ID: <48CE65EC.1080104@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2008, at 11:42, Jim Hendler wrote:
> 
[snip]
> 
> 
> Let me try to tease out the various options. Corrections welcome.
> 
> 1) (Alan's) We put a *triple* (i.e., change the graph) in. Advantages:
> "works"[1] for all RDF serializations. Disadvantages: Breaks syntactic
> layering; contaminates the graph and the structural model; *requires* a
> bespoke solution (thus precludes using standards like XInclude).
>

Just for my understanding: why would this solution preclude using
XInclude? If there is an extra triple defined in some vocabulary,
wouldn't that be orthogonal to the usage of XInclude?

Cheers

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 13:41:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC