- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:37:40 -0400
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > On Sep 12, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> An inclusion directive could be >> expressed as an RDF triple, and the OWL documentation could specify >> how it should be interpreted (i.e. by including the triples resulting >> from parsing the included document). > > Which is a change to the other serializations. They now have a triple that > they have to interpret specially. Not just at the reasoner level, but at the > parsing level. No they don't. The inclusion directive would be interpreted by the OWL processor, not by the RDF parser. > Indeed, why should we impose a triple on them? It's their job to carry triples. > Turtle might prefer to add an @directive instead. N3 might prefer to use their own builtin. I don't see how this affects what we need to do. -Alan
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 20:38:15 UTC