W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Comment on syntax

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:51:02 -0400
Message-Id: <8058702B-FBFB-4426-9437-3AE1863DACEE@gmail.com>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

"each annotation consists of an annotation property and an annotation  
value, and the latter can be a literal, an entity, or an anonymous  


An owl:incompatibleWith annotation value is the location of a prior  
version of the containing ontology that is incompatible with this  

Which sort of thing among literal, entity, or anonymous individual is  
"the location"

More generally, why is not any URI reference allowed as the value of  
an annotation?

The definition of entity should perhaps be earlier in the document,  
as it is used several times before it is defined.

The current definition would seem to preclude have an ontologyuri or  
versionuri, for example, as values of an anntoation.

Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:52 UTC