RE: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]

Hello Michael,

Thanks a lot for these comments! I've fixed everything apart from your third comment: an interpretation is indeed defined w.r.t D
and V in Section 2.2.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael
> Schneider
> Sent: 12 September 2008 21:04
> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Revision on DL-Semantics [RE: Candidate public working drafts]
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I did a revision on the DL Semantics. I still found a few trivial to minor
> things. Apart from them, the document is ready to be (re-)published, IMO.
> 
> Here are the points I found:
> 
>   * Introduction, last paragraph: There are now also annotations on
> annotations in OWL, so, for completeness, they should be mentioned in the
> first sentence, too. (With other words: They also should be ignored by the
> semantics, but not by the Semantics. :-)).
> 
>   * Section 2.3, table headlines: Some table headlines end in "in Int",
> others end in "in an Interpretation". Should be aligned.
> 
>   * Section 2.5: The vocabulary "V" is introduced in the first paragraph,
> but not used in the rest of the section. Originally, in section 2.2,
> Interpretations had been defined w.r.t. D /and/ V.
> 
>   * Section 3, Theorem 1: "... be a datatype map such that NDT subset NDT',
> NLT'(DT) = NLT(DT) and NFA(DT) = NFA'(DT)"..." The second condition has the
> "'"-version on the LHS of the "=", the other conditions have it on the RHS.
> Should be aligned.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
> >On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks
> >Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:15 PM
> >To: W3C OWL Working Group
> >Subject: Candidate public working drafts
> >
> >
> >The reviewing/revision process is well underway and even completed
> >for many of the core documents (see [1]). Thanks to everyone for
> >their efforts!
> >
> >At next week's teleconf we will be voting to publish these documents
> >as public working drafts. All members of the WG are therefore
> >cordially invited to inspect the documents and *speak now* if you see
> >any problems.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ian
> >
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Reviewing
> 
>

Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 20:23:30 UTC