- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:45:29 -0400 (EDT)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I don't know what you are asking for here. It is true that annotations interfere with the flow, and thus make ontology dumps hard to read, but what else can be done? I will change the "user-friendly" bit to talk explicitly about descriptions. peter From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:00:54 -0400 > Hello Peter, > > Is there a way to have comments (not rdfs:comments) in the Manchester syntax? > > "The Manchester syntax is a user-friendly compact syntax for OWL 2" > > Here is a piece of output from an OWL ontology I am working with. > Absent the labels, it isn't very user friendly. Perhaps we can have > the printout use both labels and identifiers, or even labels alone, > providing they are unique. > > -Alan > > Class: obo:artifact > Annotations: > obo:IAO_0000116 "There is not yet consensus this term", > obo:IAO_0000114 obo:IAO_0000124, > obo:IAO_0000115 "An artifact is an independent continuant that > is the intended output of an objective driven process" > SubClassOf: > snap:IndependentContinuant > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > > > > In fulfillment of ACTION-205 [1], the ready-for-review version of the > > Manchester Syntax document [2] is ready for review. > > > > peter > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/actions/205 > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 23:46:07 UTC