W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Manchester Syntax document ready (ACTION-205)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:00:54 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0809221600v4d3b5fdcjaf2edb54295e564f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

Hello Peter,

Is there a way to have comments (not rdfs:comments) in the Manchester syntax?

"The Manchester syntax is a user-friendly compact syntax for OWL 2"

Here is a piece of output from an OWL ontology I am working with.
Absent the labels, it isn't very user friendly. Perhaps we can have
the printout use both labels and identifiers, or even labels alone,
providing they are unique.

-Alan

Class: obo:artifact
    Annotations:
        obo:IAO_0000116 "There is not yet consensus this term",
        obo:IAO_0000114 obo:IAO_0000124,
        obo:IAO_0000115 "An artifact is an independent continuant that
is the intended output of an objective driven process"
    SubClassOf:
        snap:IndependentContinuant


On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> In fulfillment of ACTION-205 [1], the ready-for-review version of the
> Manchester Syntax document [2] is ready for review.
>
> peter
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/actions/205
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax
>
>
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 23:01:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC