- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:42:48 +0100
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Thanks! Ian On 5 Sep 2008, at 13:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema > Datatypes > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0100 > >> On 3 Sep 2008, at 21:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> >>> >>> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML >>> Schema Datatypes >>> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400 >>> >>>> >>>>> The revised draft letter is now available at >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime >>>>> >>>>> After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML >>>>> Schema WG. >>>> >>>> Good. Two points: >>>> >>>> 1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4. It seems to be based on thinking >>>> that >>>> the 840 is hours instead of minutes. >>> >>> The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours. I could either make that >>> explicit or >>> drop the (admittedly minor) point. >> >> I tweaked this (by appending "i.e., -720 to +840" to the offending >> sentence). Feel free to change/delete this part -- it is, as you >> say, of minor importance. >> >> IMHO, it is now ready to go -- please send it to the XML Schema WG. >> >> Thanks for your efforts on this. >> >> Ian > > Sent to the XML Schema WG, as > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/ > 2008JulSep/0135.html > > peter
Received on Sunday, 7 September 2008 21:43:32 UTC