- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:40:53 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes) > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:05:15 -0400 > >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: >> >> >Isn't RDF/XML *the* RDF serialization? >> >> That we have turtle in the Primer is just one piece of evidence that >> this is not the case. As I said, and as had been argued persuasively >> in the past, > > Pointers, please. For example in the discussion of issue 94 we made no allowances for name restrictions to avoid rdf/xml serialization issues, and in the discussion of ontology URIs concerns about xml:base were clearly delineated as being in a realm distinct from our specification. Not that the argument hinges on this. -Alan > >> a solution that is specific to a particular serialization >> of RDF is undesirable. >> >> -Alan > > peter >
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 15:41:28 UTC