- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:15:46 -0400
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan I believe you are right. Once the example is finalized with one syntax (e.g., Manchester), it should be easy to regenerate all other syntaxes. Best Jie On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > Jie, > > Please don't pay any attention to the current examples. > > Argh. > > Look, they are all going to have to be regenerated at some point. Doing them > by hand is really a mistake. Esp. as they might still change radically. > (I.e., I'm still not convinced that the current example is the best way to > go. I.e., the syntaxes are still changing!) > > Don't waste your time (Peter, either!). Mucking with one source example is > fine, but having 5 or so to keep in parallel is just wretched. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > -- Jie http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 00:16:22 UTC