- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:22:24 +0100
- To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 12 Sep 2008, at 16:05, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > >> Isn't RDF/XML *the* RDF serialization? > > That we have turtle in the Primer is just one piece of evidence that > this is not the case. As I said, and as had been argued persuasively > in the past, a solution that is specific to a particular serialization > of RDF is undesirable. We don't spec a Turtle serialization of OWL. It seems very odd to constrain ourselves from using standard, widely implemented, W3C technologies as they are intended to be used in order to accommodate a non-normative syntax over which we do not have, nor do we desire, any control. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 15:19:52 UTC