- From: Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:58:41 +0200
- To: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, All detailed review comments to [1] are now on the wiki. This includes remarks on typos (as my English is not impeccable, I did not dare edit even where it looked clear to me). In general, I find the spec somewhat unbalanced in terms of exemplification, technical depth and self-containment.. As the document is quite long and comprehensive, I would be curious to see some 'profile' of the target user concerning his/her prior knowledge. I would say that some of the examples and explanations may look too trivial for anyone who has seen a couple of OWL ontologies. For example, a lot of examples illustrate the OWA and lack of UNA over and over again, in quite verbose a way. On the other hand, there were some parts of the text I had to read twice and to peep to some farther sections before getting the point. (I have to admit that I had only been able to follow a small fraction of the preceding WG email conversation, so the fault was surely on my side in many cases.) Regards Vojtech [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vojtech Svatek, University of Economics, Prague Nam.W.Churchilla 4, 13067 Praha 3, CZECH REPUBLIC phone: +420 224095495, e-mail: svatek@vse.cz web: http://nb.vse.cz/~svatek
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 14:05:43 UTC