- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:57:47 -0400
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> There is *no* solution which is independent of the specific RDF serialization. If we > define a bespoke solution, *all* serializations will have to be updated. I don't understand this statement. An inclusion directive could be expressed as an RDF triple, and the OWL documentation could specify how it should be interpreted (i.e. by including the triples resulting from parsing the included document). -Alan
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 19:58:22 UTC