public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from May 2016 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 26 May 2016 (Friday, 27 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 26 May 2016 (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 19 May 2016 (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: constraints vs constraining + validating (was Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016) (Thursday, 19 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Wednesday, 18 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 12 May 2016 (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 12 May 2016 (Thursday, 12 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 12 May 2016 (Wednesday, 11 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 May 2016 (Monday, 9 May)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 May 2016 (Thursday, 5 May)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-164 (mutable graphs): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-164 (mutable graphs): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: [Editorial] Moving section 5 into section 3.3? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-162 (section 1.2 editorial): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-161 (terminology): [EDITORIAL] terminology fixups [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 3 May)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: regrets and votes for RDF Data Shapes WG 5 May 2016 meeting (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Sunday, 8 May)
• regrets and votes for RDF Data Shapes WG 5 May 2016 meeting (Thursday, 5 May)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 26 May 2016 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-165 (shapes and scopes introduction): [EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 22 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-167 (implicit class scope): [EDITORIAL] implicit class scope gives impression of inferencing (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-163 ("constraining"): should "constraining" and other forms of "constraint" be used less in the specification [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Wednesday, 18 May)
• On various syntax issues (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Shall we redo the 1.3 example (Tuesday, 17 May)
• Re: agenda suggestion for this week (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Shall we redo the 1.3 example (was: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148)) (Monday, 16 May)
• [Editorial] Moving section 5 into section 3.3? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: [EDITORIAL] Scope examples (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-161 (terminology): [EDITORIAL] terminology fixups [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 12 May 2016 (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Saturday, 7 May)
• New Terminology Section (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Thursday, 5 May)
• ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-155 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-157 (constraint component support): the support for constraint components is incorrectly stated [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: ISSUE-141: Proposal for sh:type (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 2 May)
• Re: ISSUE-78: Proposal for Abstract Classes Constraint (Sunday, 1 May)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: Shall we redo the 1.3 example (was: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148)) (Monday, 16 May)
• [EDITORIAL] Scope examples (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Saturday, 7 May)

Jim Amsden

• Re: Transitive? (Tuesday, 17 May)
• Re: Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: what is inferencing? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Friday, 6 May)

Karen Coyle

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-165 (shapes and scopes introduction): [EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 22 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-165 (shapes and scopes introduction): [EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 20 May)
• primer.md (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-161 (terminology): [EDITORIAL] terminology fixups [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Simplification of scopes section (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: what is inferencing? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Monday, 9 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: scopes, filters, and focus [was Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec]] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 2 May)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)

Miika Alonen

• Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (Friday, 6 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-164 (mutable graphs): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Friday, 20 May)
• proposed reply to Tom Baker [was Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016] (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Thursday, 19 May)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: On various syntax issues (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: agenda suggestion for this week (Monday, 16 May)
• agenda suggestion for this week (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Transitive? (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Sunday, 15 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148) (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents (Wednesday, 11 May)
• regrets (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: what is inferencing? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• ISSUE-133 several options for syntax simplification and regularization (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• what is inferencing? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: regrets and votes for RDF Data Shapes WG 5 May 2016 meeting (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined (Thursday, 5 May)
• agenda suggestion (Wednesday, 4 May)
• scopes, filters, and focus [was Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec]] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 3 May)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-167 (implicit class scope): [EDITORIAL] implicit class scope gives impression of inferencing (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-166 (two documents): separate out advanced part of specification [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-165 (shapes and scopes introduction): [EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-164 (mutable graphs): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-163 ("constraining"): should "constraining" and other forms of "constraint" be used less in the specification [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ACTION-37: Check what happens in the shex extension that has severities (Thursday, 19 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-162 (section 1.2 editorial): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 14 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-161 (terminology): [EDITORIAL] terminology fixups [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 14 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 11 May)
• shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 1 May)

simon.steyskal

• AW: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 (Thursday, 19 May)

Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.

• Re: regrets (Wednesday, 11 May)

Tom Johnson

• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: New Terminology Section (Tuesday, 10 May)

Last message date: Friday, 27 May 2016 15:02:31 UTC