I am in favor of this change Dimitris On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > Dimitris, others, > > wouldn't it from a logical point of view make most sense to move the > content of section 5 (Results Vocabulary) into 3.3 (which is currently > empty)? Providing details of the validation results will help with the > definition of the individual constraint components, where we already > explain details of which fields of the validation results must be produced > under which conditions. It avoids forward references. I remember we > discussed this issue before and some people preferred to put the result > vocabulary to a later stage because it is less relevant than the library of > core components, but then we are not producing a tutorial here but a formal > spec. Giving a beginner's introduction to SHACL is not the goal of this > document (and we would fail miserably no matter how hard we tried). > > Thanks, > Holger > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://aligned-project.eu Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 06:29:37 UTC