W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-157 (constraint component support): the support for constraint components is incorrectly stated [SHACL Spec]

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:05:16 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1f9bc700-dbd5-ce0f-9891-91b6d19bf14c@topquadrant.com>
On 29/04/2016 17:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> There are still some glitches with contexts.
> "For example, the context of the component defining the sh:closed property is
> sh:NodeConstraint. This means that sh:closed can only be used with sh:constraint."
> This seems to indicate that the meaning of contexts is to limit which
> properties they can be used with.  This is not correct - the meaning of
> contexts is to limit which constraint classes they can occur in.  These
> limitations then limit which properties they can be used with, but limiting
> the properties is not the meaning of contexts.

Ok, I have deleted that sentence to avoid this impression.

> "The relationship between a constraint component and the constraint type that
> it can be used with is called the context of the component."
> Many components can be used with multiple constraint types.

Ok, changed to "constraint types" (plural).


Assuming this addresses your comment I have closed ISSUE-157 for now.

Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 03:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:33 UTC