W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: regrets and votes for RDF Data Shapes WG 5 May 2016 meeting

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:22:28 -0700
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <572B8F64.9010306@gmail.com>
That's an interesting idea.  However, I think that a more detailed proposal is
needed to see how this fits into the current SHACL syntax.

peter


On 05/05/2016 01:18 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:

> 
> ISSUE-135: and/or syntactic sugar
>   In principle, I like simplicity but I'm unsure how to go there.
> 
>   In ShEx, ANDs, ORs and triple constraints are composed into triple
>   expressions. A shape has a triple expression (likely an AND), a
>   CLOSEDness flag, and a list of open properties (like QCRs).
> 
>   A SHACL could follow this pattern a la
>   clin:AdmissionForm a sh:shape; sh:closed true;
>     sh:expr [ a sh:And ; sh:exprs (
>       [ sh:predicate clin:givenName ; sh:nodeKind sh:Literal ]
>       [ sh:predicate clin:familyName ; sh:nodeKind sh:Literal ]
>     ) ].
> 
>   I've made a proposal to that effect:
>   https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-135:_and.2For_syntactic_sugar
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 18:30:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:33 UTC