W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:33:52 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07dae1f0-9723-e2de-fb58-deb6ae76a2a9@topquadrant.com>
On 7/05/2016 23:08, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
>
> I would generally prefer to remove 4.1.1 completely and move the 
> content directly in the related spec sections
> The reason is that there are (too) many different ways a shape can end 
> up invalid and there is no way we can re-enumerate them in a separate 
> section e.g. sh:maxCount "-1" or sh:minCount "a", sh:scopeClass "1232" 
> are valid or not?
> If we keep this section I would prefer it to say something like. "A 
> shapes graph is valid if it conforms to the following shapes graphs 
> ... " and nothing more

Fully agreed.

Holger
Received on Sunday, 8 May 2016 22:41:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:33 UTC