- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 18:17:42 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 5/9/16 4:32 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > To avoid confusion, SHACL has two constructs where rdfs:subClassOf > triples matter, and both are in the data graph: > > - sh:class > - sh:scopeClass > > In neither of them any form of inferencing is needed - I would be the > last person on this mailing list to make SHACL require inferencing. All > we require is *querying* or pattern matching like SPARQL does it, and > SPARQL provides the rdfs:subClassOf* construct as a convenience, while > the same can easily be programmed in any other execution language. > > Holger This seems to be an approach that isn't articulated in the spec - that SHACL requires *querying* "like SPARQL does it." Is that what others understand? I'm not objecting to this, I just haven't heard it stated like this before. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 01:20:23 UTC