- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:54 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 01:12:28 UTC
On 26/05/2016 7:12, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Following up on last week's call, pretty much the same agenda: > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.05.26 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies > - IBM Cloud > On ISSUE-141 I thought we had decided to postpone a resolution until we have evaluated the more global change with regards to sh:constraint. Getting rid of that property would simplify the syntax for mixed ranges already, and adding sh:Union/sh:OrConstraint would be even better and remove the need for a merged sh:type property. In case I am late for the meeting, my votes are on the proposals page. There seems to be agreement so far to rename sh:PropertyScope to sh:scopeProperty and to have a specific property for SPARQL constraint, called sh:sparql. I am also OK with publishing the current shapshot. It's far from perfect but much better than what's currently online. Holger
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 01:12:28 UTC