- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:05:25 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 16/05/2016 9:13, Irene Polikoff wrote: > As I read it through, I think section 2 Intro pretty clearly says that > there are MUST be constraints and there MAY be explicit scope definition > using scopes and filters and, if a shape doesnąt explicitly define its > scope, its scope could be determined from the information available > elsewhere. > > However, the reference to later sections is somewhat vague and it may be > clearer if the following > > The set of focus nodes may be defined explicitly in a shape using scopes > and > filters, or provided by the validation engine as defined in later sections. > > > Was replaced with something like: > > The set of focus nodes for a shape may be defined explicitly in a shape > using scopes and > filters. It may also be determined by the validation engine from the > information provided in other shapes as described in later sections. > > > Possibly referring specifically to a later section. Would it be section > 4.7? Yes this makes sense to me, and I have added specific pointers to the sections on sh:valueShape and sh:or as typical examples for such scoping-by-reference: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/317e77c75f74619adb670bacab3bd02ac47fca38 Thanks, Holger > > Irene > > > > On 5/15/16, 6:04 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > >> SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION: >> "2. Shapes >> >> Shapes are SHACL instances of sh:Shape and define one or more >> constraints that a set of focus nodes can be validated against. The set >> of focus nodes may be defined explicitly in a shape using scopes and >> filters, or provided by the validation engine as defined in later >> sections." > >
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 01:05:58 UTC