- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:43:20 +0300
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+u4+a1+6i5cnrtgQ8iHZoPhiF+qWXgZCFMbKA70cWxcV=cNWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Regrets for missing today's telco All my votes are in the proposals page, regarding the agenda issues issue 141: I would prefer to keep the current design (sh:class / sh:datatype), if this is not possible, I would favor 3c the behavior of 3a is non-deterministic and depends on data on the data graph e.g. ex:A ex:p "asdf"^^ex:myDT might or might not pass validation depending on if ex:myDT a rdfs:Literal exists in the data graph and here we also have the inference issue for subclasses of rdfs:Literal which complicates the constraint e.g. one might have ex:myDT a ex:Literal in the data graph and ex:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal somewhere else 3b cannot express non-xsd datatypes which, imho is out of the question The behavior of 3c is consistent and depends only on shape definitions the equivalent shapes definition would be ex:S sh:property [ sh:predicate ex:p sh:type ex:myDT sh:nodeKind sh:Literal ] 3c needs 2 constraints (sh:type / sh:nodeKind) but so does the existing design (sh:class / sh:datatype) we cannot simplify definitions without loosing something issue 133: I would favor my proposal of course I also have a draft revision ready on a separate branch if accepted https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/compare/editorial-dk Regarding the draft publication I think the resolution of issue 133 needs to be integrated in the spec before publication we also need to discuss where to position the current section 3 (shapes & validation) or how this needs to change if sections 1-3 become consistent and flow well, the rest of the spec will be easy to manage On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Here is the agenda for tomorrow. FYI, I put ISSUE-133 on it as a reference > for a syntax related discussion although it's clear that there are several > related issues. > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.05.19 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - > IBM Cloud > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://aligned-project.eu Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 06:44:15 UTC