- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 19:56:42 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-163 ("constraining"): should "constraining" and other forms of "constraint" be used less in the specification [SHACL Spec]
http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/163
Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
On product: SHACL Spec
Both internal and external reviews of the SHACL specification have indicated
that they have problems with the use of the word "constraining". One
option is to dramatically reduce the use of the various forms of
"constraint" in the spec.
See
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016May/0000.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016May/0004.html
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 19:56:45 UTC