Re: Simplification of scopes section (see also ISSUE-148)

SHACL has allowed embedded shapes from the beginning.  Initially it allowed
the embedding to be recursive, but this is currently not allowed.  One
construct that allows recursive shapes is sh:valueShape.  See for constructs that
allow for embedded shapes, and for
details on sh:valueShape.

It is possible to have something like SHACL that does not do embedding at all.
 SPIN works this way, I think.  Filters can also be used to get some of the
effects of embedding, but I don't think that they are as expressive as embedding.

However, there is a difference between filters and embedding in the validation
results that would be returned.  Note that the validation results for ex:s1
below are for a person who has a dependent without a SSN, not for the
dependent.  A non-embedding filter solution would produce validation results
for the dependent itself.


On 05/15/2016 07:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> On 5/14/16 1:08 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> One problem with having all shapes initiate validation is that embedded shapes
>> would as well.
>> So in
>> ex:s1 rdf:type sh:Shape ;
>>    sh:scopeClass ex:Person ;
>>    sh:property [ sh:predicate ex:dependent ;
>>                  sh:valueShape [ a sh:Shape ;
>>                                  sh:property [ sh:predicate ex:SSN ;
>>                                                sh:minCount 1 ] ] ] .
>> the scope of the embedded shape would be all nodes in the data graph,
>> resulting in validation reports for any node that does not have a value for
>> ex:SSN.
> I thought that filter shapes would be used if further refinement of the scope
> is needed. This appears to be using a shape for that purpose (and I don't
> recall this being mentioned before). Even with a defined scope it isn't clear
> to me what the scope in the embedded shape would act on as its initial input,
> since the spec says that a shapes graph is compared to a data graph, but the
> result of scoping \= a new data graph. ? Anyway, is embedding shapes allowed?
> If so, what are the rules for how that is implemented?
> kc
>> If all shapes are to have scopes then there are ways around this problem.  One
>> would be that shapes are not embedded in other shapes.  Instead there would be
>> a new kind of SHACL thing that is used when the current effect of embedding
>> shapes in shapes is desired.
>> peter

Received on Sunday, 15 May 2016 17:38:09 UTC