- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:24:09 -0700
- To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I suggest sh:self as a better name for sh:node. peter On 05/10/2016 07:36 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > After a quick offline discussion with Holger we would like to propose some > work towards syntax simplification > > The proposal has 2 aspects that go together > 1. we remove the sh:defaultValueType from SHACL (Peter also had concerns with > this - see issue-128) > 2. we simplify sh:constraint in the following ways > > a. sh:constraint is renamed to sh:node (other names welcome) and may have only > values of sh:NodeConstraint type > b. native sparql constraints (which could be used inside sh:constraint) are > now declared separately using a new property sh:sparqlConstraint that allows > only sh:SparqlConstraints > > We believe this is a simplification everyone will like and would like to put > it in the agenda for the next telco. Any comments are welcome > > rational for this change is the discussion for wording section 2.3. > sh:defaultValueType was complicating things and one of the reasons it was > introduced is to disambiguate the values of sh:constraint. > With this change every predicate can have only one possible type now > and sh:defaultValueType is no longer needed > > Best, > Dimitris > > -- > Dimitris Kontokostas > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association > Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, > http://http://aligned-project.eu <http://aligned-project.eu/> > Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas > Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT >
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 20:24:42 UTC