On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > I suggest sh:self as a better name for sh:node. > sh:self is fine for me, should we change sh:NodeConstraint to sh:SelfConstraint for consistency as well? (I am fine with both) > > peter > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http:// http://aligned-project.eu Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 20:41:55 UTC