- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:58:53 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 7/05/2016 23:32, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > The wording in 2.3 is still problematic. From that section: > > sh:PropertyConstraint is the class of all property constraints. Property > constraints apply on the value of a property on the focus node. > > However, sh:minCount does not work this way, as it is about the set of values > of a property. > > What does it mean to be a class of something? Even the new terminology > section does not help, as it just opens up the question of how a class > represents anything and how nodes can exist independent of any RDF graph. > > How do default value types interact with the terminology section? > > > What I am seeing here is a bunch of attempts to patch up something that is a > poor design from the start. It is thus no surprise that each attempt only > exposes more and more problems and requires more and more machinery. I disagree completely. Anyway, we are currently starting bottom-up, with proper and official definitions of the basic terminology. Once we apply consistent terminology throughout the document, things will become clearer and cleaner. Holger
Received on Sunday, 8 May 2016 23:21:08 UTC