public-annotation@w3.org from July 2015 by date

Friday, 31 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Text Position Selector in the DOM BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? BigBlueHat via GitHub

Thursday, 30 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: "Stacked" selectors? Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] Text Position Selector in the DOM Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• "Stacked" selectors? Benjamin Young
• [web-annotation] Text Position Selector in the DOM BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples James M Snell
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples Benjamin Young
• To Web Annotation (from Annotator 2.x...currently) Benjamin Young
• Re: Multiple bodies v. multiple annotations: annotating a base annotation Jacob Jett
• Re: Multiple bodies v. multiple annotations: annotating a base annotation Suhrbier, Lutz
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

• Re: [note] Web Annotation Data Model Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? Melvin Carvalho via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples BigBlueHat via GitHub

Friday, 24 July 2015

• Re: Seeking status of Robust Link Anchoring Arthur Barstow
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Seeking status of Robust Link Anchoring Frederick Hirsch
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Timothy Cole
• Seeking status of Robust Link Anchoring Arthur Barstow

Thursday, 23 July 2015

• Re: Attempting to re-contextualize Hypothes.is JSON Benjamin Young
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Robert Sanderson
• RE: Multiple bodies v. multiple annotations: annotating a base annotation Timothy Cole
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Frederick Hirsch
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Robert Sanderson
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Robert Sanderson
• Re: Multiple bodies v. multiple annotations: annotating a base annotation Suhrbier, Lutz
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

• Re: Attempting to re-contextualize Hypothes.is JSON Jacob Jett
• Attempting to re-contextualize Hypothes.is JSON Benjamin Young
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Jacob Jett
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Clarify status of specification table in 4.2.1 Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Clarify status of specification table in 4.2.1 Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Create dereferenceable JSON-LD context document Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Update protocol WD from 2015-07-22 call Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Update protocol WD from 2015-07-22 call Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Robert Sanderson
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Cole, Timothy W
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Frederick Hirsch
• [note] Web Annotation Data Model WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Robert Sanderson
• Re: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Jacob Jett
• RE: [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Denenberg, Ray
• [model] Clarifying annotation architecture Frederick Hirsch
• Draft Minutes from teleconference 22 July 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Multiple bodies v. multiple annotations: annotating a base annotation Denenberg, Ray
• Re: Discovery/Search user stories Robert Sanderson
• Re: Discovery/Search user stories Benjamin Young
• Discovery Use Cases Benjamin Young

Monday, 20 July 2015

• Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 22 July 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Protocol WD for TAG ready? Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Discovery/Search user stories Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? Andreas Kuckartz via GitHub

Sunday, 19 July 2015

• Re: Discovery/Search user stories Jacob Jett

Friday, 17 July 2015

• Fwd: First User Story implementation, now using social web WG vocab (AS 2.0) Robert Sanderson

Thursday, 16 July 2015

• Protocol WD for TAG ready? Robert Sanderson
• Re: Protocol Affordances Robert Sanderson
• Protocol Affordances Benjamin Young

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Recommend StillImage instead of Image? Raphael Troncy via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Discovery/Search user stories Robert Sanderson
• Draft minutes 15 July 2015 teleconference Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [web-annotation] Recommend StillImage instead of Image? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Create dereferenceable JSON-LD context document Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: AntHillHacks - July 18-26 S Uskudarli
• Re: AntHillHacks - July 18-26 Benjamin Young
• anno-ACTION-26: Characterize issue related to http profiling and options to go forward Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• anno-ACTION-25: Write user story about discovery Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• anno-ACTION-24: Write user story about discovery Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• anno-ACTION-23: Write use case about feed for discovery Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• anno-ACTION-22: Work on roadmap Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• AntHillHacks - July 18-26 TB Dinesh
• Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Ben De Meester
• Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Paolo Ciccarese
• RE: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Denenberg, Ray

Tuesday, 14 July 2015

• Re: [h-dev] JavaScript Anchoring Utility Libraries Nick Stenning

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Tim Cole via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Tim Cole via GitHub
• Protocol, Section 4.2.1 (Create Annotation) -- May vs. Should Cole, Timothy W

Monday, 13 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• JavaScript Anchoring Utility Libraries Randall Leeds
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Saturday, 11 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Benjamin Goering via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Ivan Herman via GitHub

Friday, 10 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Erik Wilde via GitHub
• RE: Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Denenberg, Ray
• Re: Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Robert Sanderson
• RE: Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add reference for "LDP Container" Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add reference to CORS Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Robert Sanderson
• RE: Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Denenberg, Ray
• Adherence to standards vs specialized functionality Robert Sanderson
• Re: Annotation Bodies Telcon (Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015) Doug Schepers
• RE: Annotation Bodies Telcon (Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015) Denenberg, Ray
• Annotation Bodies Telcon (Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015) Doug Schepers
• Closed: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Client can't determine if user has authorization to modify annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• RE: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Denenberg, Ray
• Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Robert Sanderson
• RE: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Denenberg, Ray
• Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 15 July 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Takeshi Kanai via GitHub

Thursday, 9 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: Pieces and parts Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Pieces and parts Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Benjamin Young
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Jacob Jett
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? Jacob via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Takeshi Kanai via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Erik Wilde via GitHub

Wednesday, 8 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? Jacob via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? Jacob via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Should the namespace change? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation raydAtLC via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Doug Schepers via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Jacob Jett
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Jacob Jett
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Jacob Jett
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation raydAtLC via GitHub
• Meeting minutes 2015-07-08 Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• RE: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Feedback Web Annotation Protocol Antoine Isaac
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? Takeshi Kanai via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Ivan Herman via GitHub

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Ed Summers via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Randall Leeds via GitHub
• [web-annotation] avoid constraining HTTP Erik Wilde via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Annotation Lists Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: Activity Streams and Annotations Robert Sanderson
• Re: Activity Streams and Annotations James M Snell
• Re: Activity Streams and Annotations Benjamin Young

Monday, 6 July 2015

• Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 8 July 2015 Frederick Hirsch
• [web-annotation] Support for Notification Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Support for search Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] add reference to Annotation Protocol to Model Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] add reference to Annotation Protocol to Model via GitHub
• [note] WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver
• [protocol] FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol published [resend] Frederick Hirsch
• [protocol] FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol published Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation via GitHub
• Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson

Sunday, 5 July 2015

• Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Randall Leeds

Friday, 3 July 2015

• Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Bill Hunt

Saturday, 4 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Paolo Ciccarese

Friday, 3 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Jacob Jett
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation TB Dinesh
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Ivan Herman via GitHub

Thursday, 2 July 2015

• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Doug Schepers via GitHub
• RE: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Randall Leeds via GitHub
• RE: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Denenberg, Ray
• Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Use "Web" rather than "Open" Annotation? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [note] Web Annotation Protocol WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver
• [web-annotation] Add reference for "LDP Container" Arthur Barstow via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Add reference to CORS Arthur Barstow via GitHub
• Call for Exclusions: Web Annotation Protocol Coralie Mercier

Last message date: Friday, 31 July 2015 15:40:58 UTC