W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > July 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer

From: Tim Cole via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 02:55:57 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-121468777-1436928956-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
This seems a potentially useful change. A few questions first though 
to make sure I am understanding the implications correctly (and then 
separately a possible proposal):
1) The list of annotations (call it AList) can itself be a LDP-RS 
(i.e., AList does not have to be an LDP Container). Is this correct?
2) Even though they are part of AList through the membershipResource 
predicate of the Direct Container in which they are contained, the 
listed Annotations can be retrieved individually and independently 
AList directly from their Direct Container. Is this correct?
3) Would/could retrieving (GET) AList retrieve a graph that includes 
as sub graphs all of the listed annotations, e.g., just as retrieving 
the http://example.org/netWorth/nw1/ LDP-RS in the LDP 1.0 spec 
retrieves all of the assets and liabilities contained in the 
associated Direct Containers? 
4) Can the Prefer Request header (with appropriate include and/or omit
 parameters) be used to retrieve a shorter representation of the AList
 resource (or does this approach only work with LDP Containers)?  

GitHub Notif of comment by tcole3
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 02:55:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:38 UTC