- From: Tim Cole via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 02:55:57 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
This seems a potentially useful change. A few questions first though to make sure I am understanding the implications correctly (and then separately a possible proposal): 1) The list of annotations (call it AList) can itself be a LDP-RS (i.e., AList does not have to be an LDP Container). Is this correct? 2) Even though they are part of AList through the membershipResource predicate of the Direct Container in which they are contained, the listed Annotations can be retrieved individually and independently AList directly from their Direct Container. Is this correct? 3) Would/could retrieving (GET) AList retrieve a graph that includes as sub graphs all of the listed annotations, e.g., just as retrieving the http://example.org/netWorth/nw1/ LDP-RS in the LDP 1.0 spec retrieves all of the assets and liabilities contained in the associated Direct Containers? 4) Can the Prefer Request header (with appropriate include and/or omit parameters) be used to retrieve a shorter representation of the AList resource (or does this approach only work with LDP Containers)? -- GitHub Notif of comment by tcole3 See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/37#issuecomment-121468777
Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 02:55:59 UTC