- From: Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:41:29 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I think the basic point @dret is making is that even if a server doesn't advertise support for certain things the client could still try throwing things at it and they might stick. But also, there seems to be a question we haven't answered here. I think one answer motivates the MUSTs. Must an annotation container only contain annotations? Even if the answer is "yes" then I think SHOULD might be more appropriate. If the answer is "no" then the MUST is _definitely_ not appropriate. -- GitHub Notif of comment by tilgovi See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/51#issuecomment-119709221
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 19:41:30 UTC