W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > July 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use?

From: Takeshi Kanai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 02:18:55 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-119785491-1436408334-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@azaroth42 You are right. We "can" use the annotation context URI and 
make a valid JSON-LD. It is not necessary to list up all URIs in 
JSON-LD packets. On the other hand, as you admitted, the JSON-LD I 
wrote is also the valid data from grammatical view point. The Question
 is whether the JSON-LD I wrote is.valid as Annotation response or 
not. According to the spec, it sounds to me that the response is 
invalid because it does not describe the annotation URI, as context.

The data was published from a LDP server while I was evaluating the 
protocol spec (I didn't put the iana staff though) Do I have to turn 
it to publish the annotation URI context only? Will the updated server
 pass the LDP tests?

As @dret suggested, I think utilizing LDP properties, or available 
existing properties as much as possible is a huge plus to accelerate 
the adaption of Web Annotation protocol, and I think that is why Web 
Annotation Protocol is based on LDP, am I wrong?

GitHub Notif of comment by tkanai
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 02:19:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:37 UTC