W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > July 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Absolute or relative URI's in examples

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:16:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtmyzP1JdGPbr-xViQq_bUdmW+A6_vKrWq2ipneRvQgFzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
Cc: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
You are right, the @base must be inside the @context - so to avoid
full URIs in the JSON-LD you would have to use the verbose

{ "@context":  [
    {"@base": "http://example.com"},
    "http://www.w3.org/ns/oa/context?" ]

  "..": "..."
}


Perhaps simpler is to use full URIs in the Turtle. People who know
Turtle will know how to make relative URIs - while people who are a
bit fresh will still see it at a more standard 'triple level'.  This
should somewhat discourage people from accidentally making URIs that
don't resolve.


(Why is the oa @context missing from the JSON-LD example? Have we
decided on a URI yet?)



Rant time about JSON-LD @context:

-- we had several discussions in JSON-LD community about this.. in
early draft you could inherit a @base from an external @context - but
we changed our mind as that sounded quite confusing and dangerous, and
raised lots of scary issues with multiple contexts.

In one evil version you could do an external context that defined {
"@base": "../" } (I actually wanted to do this! :))  and which would
be resolved by the location of the document (e.g.
file:///something/something.jsonld ) rather than from the external
context's URI. But that is just too far away from how relative IRIs
are resolved per document on the rest of the web - and hence the @base
inheritance was removed, and a stronger requirement for absolute URIs
in @base and @vocab was added.



On 29 July 2015 at 16:21, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is> wrote:
> Yeah. Think that should.
>
> I'd wondered about doing the same for the JSON-LD examples, but it's some
> pretty heavy cruft because `@base` isn't top level (afaik), so it ends up
> looking like:
> ```json
> {
>   "@context": {
>     "@base": "http://example.com/"
>   }
> }
> ```
> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#base-iri
>
> Also...
>> Please note that the @base will be ignored if used in external contexts.
>
> Which is kind of sad...but also makes sense.



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/    http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2015 09:17:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:38 UTC