Re: [web-annotation] Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use?

Soo... is there any reason to adopt a change suggested by this issue? 
I think not. I would actually support the idea brought up just now by 
Erik wherein the spec sticks to pure JSON with some additional text 
about how to augment it for JSON-LD / RDF world (essentially, slap the
 context on it). I would love it if we recommended that anyone 
producing JSON-LD stick to the recommended context to make interop 
easier.

Dropping our context from the examples seems like a bad idea unless 
we're dropping all context from the examples and trying to really push
 a particular set of keys.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by tilgovi
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/52#issuecomment-120088083

Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 18:01:08 UTC