W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > July 2015

Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation

From: Jacob Jett <jgjett@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:09:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CABzPtBLuO9bQjrqyDFuzfm5fg7ZMzrGytBKYW-87LKGLtWWTig@mail.gmail.com>
To: raydAtLC via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Cc: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
+1 to this.

My previous +1 should be read as agreeing with the more general name change
of the spec itself.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, raydAtLC via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> Based on today’s discussion (on the call)  in my opinion keeping the
> namespace is the way to go.  Tim’s argument convinced me: While the
> new spec will not be backward compatible – which is the argument for a
>  new namespace -two namespaces could result in two divergent specs,
> while a single namespace is more likely to encourage those who have
> already implemented the old spec to make the necessary adjustments.
> Rob’s observation that the old spec is only a draft strengthens the
> argument to keep the namespace.
>
> --
> GitHub Notif of comment by raydAtLC
> See
> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/46#issuecomment-119679105
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 18:10:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:37 UTC