Re: [web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional?

@melvincarvalho great read, but not quite what I was after.

Mostly what I'm wondering is how an LDP server or client expresses / 
"knows" a resource is an LDP-RS vs. a non-RDF Source. Is it merely 
that the document's media type is an encoding of an RDF-based data 
model (ala JSON-LD, Turtle, etc)? and, if that is the vector on which 
the "RDF-ness" of the resource is deteremined to what end is it 
valuable/important to the server or client? Can the client do anything
 "smart" with it--particularly in the scenario where there is *only* 
and LDP Basic Container and no Direct or Indirect access to 
"sub-graphs."

My feeling is that one could setup an LDP Basic Container which stores
 only JSON-LD has no particular graph related "smarts" and is still 
technically compliant per the spec. However, I'm not sure how LDP 
clients would feel about it. :confused: 

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by BigBlueHat
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/34#issuecomment-126049297

Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2015 18:24:08 UTC