ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2023: by date

Friday, 9 June 2023
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Watson Ladd
Thursday, 8 June 2023
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Martin Thomson
- HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms Jonathan Flat
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header David Schinazi
- RE: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Eric Lawrence
- Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
- Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Wednesday, 7 June 2023
- John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
- Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
Tuesday, 6 June 2023
- Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 Harald Alvestrand via Datatracker
Sunday, 4 June 2023
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Thursday, 1 June 2023
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 Rob Sayre
Wednesday, 31 May 2023
- Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Mark Thomas
Tuesday, 30 May 2023
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Roberto Polli
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Julian Reschke
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Kazuho Oku
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Mark Nottingham
Monday, 29 May 2023
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) RFC Errata System
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Martin Thomson
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 28 May 2023
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Julian Reschke
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Poul-Henning Kamp
- Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
Saturday, 27 May 2023
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Michael Sweet
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis David Benjamin
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
Friday, 26 May 2023
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Ilari Liusvaara
- UTF-8 I can live with Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Glenn Strauss
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
Thursday, 25 May 2023
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Fwd: [Webtransport] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-06.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Thomas
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin Thomson
- Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
- Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Tommy Pauly
Wednesday, 24 May 2023
- httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 117 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
- Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12 Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Paul Wouters via Datatracker
- Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Adding more concrete guidance about digest processing and validation Lucas Pardue
- Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roberto Polli
- Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roberto Polli
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Lucas Pardue
- Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 23 May 2023
- Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Ilari Liusvaara
- Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Valentin Gosu
- John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Lucas Pardue
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Valentin Gosu
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Stefan Eissing
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? David Benjamin
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Bence Béky
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Daniel Stenberg
- Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Lucas Pardue
- Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Monday, 22 May 2023
- Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke
- Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
- Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
- Re: WebSockets and masking Dragana Damjanovic
Sunday, 21 May 2023
- Is it okay to (mis)use Referer header for "share with app" functionality? Soni L.
- Re: WebSockets and masking Martin Thomson
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Saturday, 20 May 2023
- Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau
- Re: WebSockets and masking Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau
- Re: WebSockets and masking Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau
Friday, 19 May 2023
- Re: WebSockets and masking David Schinazi
- WebSockets and masking Dragana Damjanovic
Wednesday, 17 May 2023
- Re: sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Poul-Henning Kamp
- sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly
Tuesday, 16 May 2023
- Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 Daniel Migault via Datatracker
Sunday, 14 May 2023
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Thursday, 11 May 2023
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Eric Orth
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Christopher Wood
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Eric Kinnear
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Lucas Pardue
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Martin Thomson
Wednesday, 10 May 2023
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt Tommy Pauly
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scim-cursor-pagination-00 Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 9 May 2023
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
Sunday, 7 May 2023
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Tuesday, 2 May 2023
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt Justin Richer
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Monday, 1 May 2023
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sunday, 30 April 2023
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Martin Thomson
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
Saturday, 29 April 2023
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
Friday, 28 April 2023
- Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-satp-core-00 Lucas Pardue via Datatracker
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7486 (7498) RFC Errata System
Wednesday, 26 April 2023
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt Lucas Pardue
- Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson
Tuesday, 25 April 2023
- Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-01 Darrel Miller via Datatracker
Sunday, 23 April 2023
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Saturday, 22 April 2023
- Re: I-D Action: draft-martin-http-carbon-emissions-scope-2-00.txt Rob Sayre
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt Rob Sayre
Friday, 21 April 2023
- Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Valentin Gosu
- Structured Fields: forward compatibility for future field types Valentin Gosu
Thursday, 20 April 2023
- Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Kenichi Ishibashi
Monday, 17 April 2023
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP David Schinazi
- Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly
- Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 16 April 2023
- Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Saturday, 15 April 2023
- Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Felipe Gasper
- Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Momoka Yamamoto
Friday, 14 April 2023
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) David Benjamin
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Michael Douglass
Thursday, 6 April 2023
- Content Negotiation for Multipart Response Rahul Gupta
Monday, 10 April 2023
- Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Lachlan Keller
Wednesday, 15 March 2023
- [IANA #1268625] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers (http-fields) David Dong via RT
Wednesday, 12 April 2023
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Chris Elving
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Iain McClenaghan
Thursday, 13 April 2023
- Content Negotiation for Multipart Response Rahul Gupta
Friday, 14 April 2023
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Julian Reschke
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Stefan Eissing
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Willy Tarreau
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Martin Thomson
- Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com
Thursday, 13 April 2023
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- Re: Encodings for Signatures Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11, "6.3. Usage in Signatures" Lucas Pardue
Wednesday, 12 April 2023
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) Mark Nottingham
- Encodings for Signatures Justin Richer
- Discovering WebSockets design team Lucas Pardue
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) RFC Errata System
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Eliot Lear
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation James Fuller
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 11 April 2023
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Evert Pot
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Michael Sweet
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Graham Cox
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Stefan Eissing
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Willy Tarreau
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) Julian Reschke
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
- Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) RFC Errata System
Monday, 10 April 2023
- Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson
Friday, 7 April 2023
- Re: [Last-Call] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 6 April 2023
- Adoption of Alt-SvcB Eric Orth
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 David Schinazi
- Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 5 April 2023
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Aaron Parecki
- Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
- Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
Tuesday, 4 April 2023
- Re: [alto] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson
Monday, 3 April 2023
- DRAFT minutes for IETF 116 Mark Nottingham
Saturday, 1 April 2023
- Re: HTTP over Delay-Tolerant Networks Greg Wilkins
- Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings Martin Thomson

Last message date: Friday, 9 June 2023 14:44:46 UTC
Archived on: Friday, 9 June 2023 14:44:47 UTC

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2023 by date