Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00
DRAFT agenda for IETF 117
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556)
A "return to sender" 3xx status code
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-04.txt
draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03.txt
Two new HTTP caching specifications
- Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications
- Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications
- Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications
Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05.txt
RFC 9205 vs. CL0P
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-04.txt
draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo
RFC 9412 on The ORIGIN Extension in HTTP/3
103 Early Hints
HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms
Request-Off-The-Record Mode header
- RE: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header
- Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header
Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT)
Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11
Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530))
- Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530))
- Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530))
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
UTF-8 I can live with
Fwd: [Webtransport] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-06.txt
Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT)
Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis)
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis)
- Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis)
httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 117
Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12
Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Adding more concrete guidance about digest processing and validation
Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03
- Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03
Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT)
John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT)
Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
- Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK?
Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT)
Is it okay to (mis)use Referer header for "share with app" functionality?
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
WebSockets and masking
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt
Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-12.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt
Re: [EXTERNAL] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scim-cursor-pagination-00
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-02.txt
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-satp-core-00
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7486 (7498)
Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-01
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Re: I-D Action: draft-martin-http-carbon-emissions-scope-2-00.txt
Structured Fields: forward compatibility for future field types
Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP
- Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP
Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Content Negotiation for Multipart Response
Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07
- Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07
- Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07
[IANA #1268625] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers (http-fields)
Content Negotiation for Multipart Response
Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504)
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504)
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504)
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504)
- Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11, "6.3. Usage in Signatures"
Encodings for Signatures
Discovering WebSockets design team
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421)
Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
- Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419)
Adoption of Alt-SvcB
Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13
- Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13