Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP

+1 to adoption and hoping for eventual consistency across our CONNECTed
world

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:17 AM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the reminder Tommy.
>
> I'm in favour of normalizing in this direction also.  I hold little hope
> that we'll eliminate CONNECT as an HTTP feature, but one can maybe dream of
> it being possible some day.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023, at 09:57, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > To bubble this up in people’s email inboxes — does anyone else in the
> > WG have an opinion on adopting this document or not?
> >
> > Best,
> > Tommy
> >
> >> On Apr 17, 2023, at 2:08 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I support adoption.
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> This email starts a call for adoption on
> draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp (
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-01.html).
> As discussed at IETF 116, this document defines a mechanism to use extended
> CONNECT (which supports paths and URI templates) for proxying TCP, akin to
> the UDP proxying support in RFC 9298. This does not deprecate the original
> use of CONNECT for TCP proxying.
> >>>
> >>> Please reply to this email to indicate if you support adopting this
> document in this working group.
> >>>
> >>> The call will last for 2 weeks, and end on Monday, May 1.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Tommy
>
>