- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 14:12:11 +0100
- To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
- Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Personally -- *If* we think we're going to ship Display Strings and can agree to do so, I'd prefer to do it in this revision, rather than having a third revision of Structured Fields. Figuring out consensus on that is out of my hands, though. Tommy, thank you for your service :) Cheers, > On 30 Apr 2023, at 2:07 pm, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Julian. We can certainly wait for your review and implementation update to the end of the week before processing anything > > Regarding non-ascii strings, those remain outside of the scope the WG agreed upon for *this* revision (but can certainly be part of another revision). If we as a WG collectively believe the current revision effort cannot ship without expanding the scope, then that needs to be raised and agreed upon as part of this WGLC. > > Best, > Tommy > >> On Apr 29, 2023, at 10:27 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Am 29.04.2023 um 05:04 schrieb Tommy Pauly: >>> As a reminder, our WGLC is scheduled to end next week. Please send in >>> any issues, and please reply to this email with your reviews! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tommy >> >> Hi Tommy, >> >> I'm planning to review the spec (and update my implementation) over the >> course of next week (which is indeed past the LC date). >> >> Furthermore, we also need to come to a conclusion on >> >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2494 >> >> which (AFAIR) has some remaining points to resolve. >> >> Best regards, Julian >> > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 30 April 2023 13:12:21 UTC