- From: <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:18:59 -0400
- To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, Bertrand Martin <bertrand@sentrysoftware.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:56:44PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote: > If we really want a short header name, why not just: > > CO2: <value> > > (our shed is a lovely shade now, isn't it?) > > WRT negotiation, I think adding a request header/value limits the opportunistic value and adds a tiny bit more resource usage over just sending it if you have it. > > > > On Apr 11, 2023, at 1:34 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote: > > > > > > Really good idea to get some eco accounting into http. Server-Timing already exists for some metrics and might be extended with a CO2 metric. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Server-Timing https://www.w3.org/TR/server-timing/ Cheers, Glenn
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2023 18:19:21 UTC