- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:22:44 +0000
- To: Bertrand Martin <bertrand@sentrysoftware.com>
- cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- Bertrand Martin writes: > I think it is important to specify "Scope-2" in the name of the field to make > sure everybody understand what we're reporting. Also, in the future we may > report carbon emissions in Scope-3, or other definitions from the GHG Protocol, > or another standardization body. In that case it would be better to put that information in the content of the header (as a sf-dictionary, so that we do not have to add another header later: CO2: scope-2=0.000111 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 14 April 2023 07:22:52 UTC