Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation

Bertrand Martin writes:

> I think it is important to specify "Scope-2" in the name of the field to make
> sure everybody understand what we're reporting. Also, in the future we may
> report carbon emissions in Scope-3, or other definitions from the GHG Protocol,
> or another standardization body.

In that case it would be better to put that information in the
content of the header (as a sf-dictionary, so that we do not have
to add another header later:

	CO2: scope-2=0.000111

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Friday, 14 April 2023 07:22:52 UTC