Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)

Thanks, Julian. We can certainly wait for your review and implementation update to the end of the week before processing anything 

Regarding non-ascii strings, those remain outside of the scope the WG agreed upon for *this* revision (but can certainly be part of another revision). If we as a WG collectively believe the current revision effort cannot ship without expanding the scope, then that needs to be raised and agreed upon as part of this WGLC.

Best,
Tommy

> On Apr 29, 2023, at 10:27 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> ´╗┐Am 29.04.2023 um 05:04 schrieb Tommy Pauly:
>> As a reminder, our WGLC is scheduled to end next week. Please send in
>> any issues, and please reply to this email with your reviews!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tommy
> 
> Hi Tommy,
> 
> I'm planning to review the spec (and update my implementation) over the
> course of next week (which is indeed past the LC date).
> 
> Furthermore, we also need to come to a conclusion on
> 
>  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2494
> 
> which (AFAIR) has some remaining points to resolve.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

Received on Sunday, 30 April 2023 13:07:42 UTC