ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2023 by author

Aaron Parecki

• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Friday, 9 June)

Bence Béky

• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)

Bertrand Martin

• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Brian Campbell

• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)

Caleb Queern

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)

Chris Elving

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)

Christopher Wood

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)

Daniel Migault via Datatracker

• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 (Tuesday, 16 May)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)

Darrel Miller via Datatracker

• Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-01 (Tuesday, 25 April)

David Benjamin

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)

David Dong via RT

• [IANA #1268625] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers (http-fields) (Wednesday, 15 March)

David Schinazi

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 (Thursday, 29 June)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 (Wednesday, 28 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Thursday, 8 June)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 (Thursday, 6 April)

Dennis Jackson

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)

Dragana Damjanovic

• Re: 103 Early Hints (Monday, 19 June)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Monday, 22 May)
• WebSockets and masking (Friday, 19 May)

Eliot Lear

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)

Eric J Bowman

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Monday, 19 June)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Monday, 19 June)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Monday, 19 June)
• RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Saturday, 17 June)

Eric Kinnear

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Thursday, 8 June)

Eric Orth

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)
• Adoption of Alt-SvcB (Thursday, 6 April)

Evert Pot

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Felipe Gasper

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team (Saturday, 15 April)

Glenn Strauss

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)

Graham Cox

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Greg Wilkins

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: HTTP over Delay-Tolerant Networks (Saturday, 1 April)

gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Harald Alvestrand via Datatracker

• Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 (Tuesday, 6 June)

Henry Story

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo (Wednesday, 14 June)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo (Wednesday, 14 June)

Iain McClenaghan

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)

IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 117 (Wednesday, 24 May)

Ilari Liusvaara

• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Saturday, 20 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Saturday, 20 May)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-04.txt (Wednesday, 28 June)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03.txt (Wednesday, 28 June)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05.txt (Tuesday, 20 June)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-04.txt (Wednesday, 14 June)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt (Wednesday, 17 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-12.txt (Wednesday, 10 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt (Wednesday, 10 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt (Tuesday, 2 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-02.txt (Monday, 1 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt (Thursday, 13 April)

James Fuller

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)

John Scudder via Datatracker

• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 7 June)
• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)

Jonathan Flat

• HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms (Thursday, 8 June)

Julian Reschke

• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) (Friday, 23 June)
• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) (Saturday, 10 June)
• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scim-cursor-pagination-00 (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Encodings for Signatures (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) (Tuesday, 11 April)

Justin Richer

• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Friday, 23 June)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 22 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo (Wednesday, 14 June)
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Friday, 9 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Encodings for Signatures (Wednesday, 12 April)

Kazuho Oku

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Tuesday, 30 May)

Kenichi Ishibashi

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team (Thursday, 20 April)

Lachlan Keller

• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 (Monday, 10 April)

Lars Eggert via Datatracker

• Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 25 May)

Lucas Pardue

• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 (Wednesday, 28 June)
• 103 Early Hints (Saturday, 10 June)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 (Thursday, 1 June)
• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Adding more concrete guidance about digest processing and validation (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11, "6.3. Usage in Signatures" (Thursday, 13 April)
• Discovering WebSockets design team (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Lucas Pardue via Datatracker

• Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-satp-core-00 (Friday, 28 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) (Friday, 30 June)
• DRAFT agenda for IETF 117 (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Sunday, 25 June)
• Two new HTTP caching specifications (Sunday, 25 June)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Fwd: [Webtransport] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-06.txt (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Monday, 17 April)
• Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: [Last-Call] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)
• DRAFT minutes for IETF 116 (Monday, 3 April)

Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05 (Saturday, 24 June)
• Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 (Wednesday, 5 April)

Mark Thomas

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)

Martin Duke

• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 22 May)

Martin Duke via Datatracker

• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 7 June)
• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 22 May)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)

Martin Thomson

• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Thursday, 8 June)
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Sunday, 21 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: [alto] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings (Saturday, 1 April)

Michael Douglass

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)

Michael Sweet

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Mike West

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)

Momoka Yamamoto

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team (Saturday, 15 April)

Patrick Meenan

• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Friday, 30 June)
• Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: 103 Early Hints (Saturday, 10 June)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker

• Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)

Peter Yee via Datatracker

• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12 (Wednesday, 24 May)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 30 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 29 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) (Sunday, 28 May)
• UTF-8 I can live with (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Rahul Gupta

• Content Negotiation for Multipart Response (Thursday, 6 April)
• Content Negotiation for Multipart Response (Thursday, 13 April)

Repository Activity Summary Bot

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 4 June)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 28 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 21 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 14 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 7 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 23 April)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 16 April)

RFC Errata System

• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) (Thursday, 29 June)
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Monday, 29 May)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7486 (7498) (Friday, 28 April)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) (Tuesday, 11 April)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

• RFC 9412 on The ORIGIN Extension in HTTP/3 (Monday, 12 June)

Rob Sayre

• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 (Thursday, 1 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-martin-http-carbon-emissions-scope-2-00.txt (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt (Saturday, 22 April)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker

• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)

Roberto Polli

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 24 May)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker

• Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 8 June)
• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 23 May)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Shivan Kaul Sahib

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)
• Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Thursday, 8 June)

Soni L.

• A "return to sender" 3xx status code (Thursday, 29 June)
• Is it okay to (mis)use Referer header for "share with app" functionality? (Sunday, 21 May)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Thursday, 13 April)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: 103 Early Hints (Sunday, 11 June)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Tim Bray

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Tommy Pauly

• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Monday, 26 June)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 (Wednesday, 14 June)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Wednesday, 14 June)
• Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Thursday, 25 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Sunday, 30 April)
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Saturday, 29 April)
• Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Monday, 17 April)
• Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) (Monday, 17 April)

Valentin Gosu

• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team (Friday, 21 April)
• Structured Fields: forward compatibility for future field types (Friday, 21 April)

Watson Ladd

• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Sunday, 25 June)
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Friday, 9 June)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Saturday, 20 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Saturday, 20 May)
• Re: WebSockets and masking (Saturday, 20 May)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation (Tuesday, 11 April)

Ángel

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Monday, 12 June)

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2023 22:06:54 UTC