Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)

On Mon, May 1, 2023, at 00:59, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> 4. The escape rules are inconsistent:
>>
>> 	% 	->	%25
>> 	"	->	\"
>> 	\	->	\\
>
> If that's still the case, we need to fix it.

Fix what though?  That's consistent, even if it is a little janky to have two layers of quoting.

I'd be OK with \25 -> % if it came to that.  It makes the change to the spec more intrusive, but it would avoid a second layer of quoting.

Like Mark, I'm in favour of doing UTF-8 strings this time around.

Received on Sunday, 30 April 2023 22:51:27 UTC