- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:04:42 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, Glenn Strauss <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com>, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, Bertrand Martin <bertrand@sentrysoftware.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 22:31, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > > It's a complete waste of time and energy. Carbon emissions are not relevant on a > per request basis, even if they could be measured by a running process. > completely agree with Roy's assertions ... in the end this activity will lead to opaque data. also completely agree with others in the sense that we should try to do something to help our beautiful spaceship Earth. and to hijack this thread and go completely sidewise ... any approach should start outside this particular stack ... for example we could be enumerating high impact carbon activity like we do with security CVE's. A planetwide system that identifies the worst planet 'zero days' is something that is tractable and would put a 'name' (or at least an opaque identifier) to the worst environmental offenses that mankind incurs to this planet. Precise data like CO2 generation would then have a better 'context'. /crazy rant over thx, James Fuller
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2023 05:05:00 UTC